EDUCATIONAL
POLICY FORMULATION AND IMPLEMENTATION IN NIGERIA
By
Drake Omonode
Introduction
In education as in other fields of human
Endeavour, every official Action of an organization must have a backing or a
basis. It is this Purpose that a policy serves. A policy defines the area in
which Decisions are to be made, but it does not make the decision. It usually provides
a general guide that facilitates decision-making. Educational Policies provide
the direction for educational activities. The formulation of an educational
policy sets the stage for Implementation which, according to Ukeje (1986), is
perhaps the Most important aspect of planning. Planning is usually an action which
succeeds policy formulation but precedes implementation. Unfortunately,
educational policies and goal attainment have been Irreconcilable due to
implementation constraints. Perhaps this Accounts for the observation made by
Governor Oyakhilome of Rivers
State in an address sent to the
Convention of the Nigerian Association For Educational Administration and
Planning in 1986. He expressed Concern about the problem of policy
implementation thus:
We
know it is difficult to realize planned objectives one
Hundred
percent. But our experience in planning education
In
this country shows a disturbing gap between planned
Objectives
and attained results ... As professionals in the field of
Education,
it may be pertinent to identify whether those critical
Gaps
are results of faulty planning or faulty implementation
(Oyakhilome
1986:2).
Policy implementation in education is a
conspicuous national Problem that has taken centre stage in Nigeria. This paper
examines The problem in some detail and explores its implications for the
Development of Nigeria.
The concept of educational policy
Educational policies are initiatives
mostly by governments that Determine the direction of an educational system
(Okoroma 2000:190). According to Osokoya (1987:2):
Education
is a distinctive way in which the society inducts its
Young
ones into full membership. So every modern society
Needs
some educational policies to guide it in the process of
Such
initiation.
In the view of Awokoya (1981),
educational policy is directed towards Increasing the quality of life of a
people. He believes that the objective Of any policy is to satisfy individual
needs, community pressures And the degree of complexity and sophistication to
which socialised
Personnel must be educated and trained
to meet these demands. The Following considerations, according to Awokoya
(1981), are necessary To guide the formulation of adequate educational policy.
• It should be formulated and adopted
through a political process Which acknowledges the reality and legitimacy of
conflicting Interests and desires among its participants
• It should portray some elements of
guidance for properly directed And coordinated action towards the attainment of
the desired goals
• It should contain information on the
broad objectives that should Be reached
• It should be a binding guide on the
actions of those implementing it
• It should be enforceable and enforced
by the society which Formulates it.
Kerr (1976) believes that, for a policy
to qualify as an educational Policy, it must be distinct from other policies.
In his view, educational Policies are distinguishable from other policies by
the fact that Policies on education are part and parcel of educational
institutions. However, it is important to note that not all policies formulated
in Educational institutions can qualify as educational po1icies. Generally, Policies
must be rational and purposeful to enable them to stand the Test of time.
National Policy on Education
Prior to 1977 Nigeria operated an
educational policy inherited from Britain at independence. The inability of
this policy to satisfy the National aspirations of the country rendered it
unpopular. In 1969 a National Curriculum Conference was organised which
reviewed the Inherited curriculum and identified new national goals for
Nigeria’s Education. A National Seminar was organised by the National Educational
Research and Development Council (NERDC) in 1973 Under the Chairmanship of
Chief S. O. Adebo. This gave rise to the National Policy on Education in 1977
(Akangbou 1985; Bello 1986; Okoroma 2000).
The National Policy on Education is
anchored on Nigeria’s philosophy On education as enunciated through the nation’s
objectives. Nigeria Has five main national objectives as provided by the Second
National Development Plan and accepted as the necessary foundation for the
National Policy on Education. They are
the building of:
• a free and democratic society
• a just and egalitarian society
• a united strong and self-reliant
nation
• a great and dynamic economy
• a land of bright and full
opportunities for all citizens (FRN, 1998).
FORMULATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF EDUCATIONAL POLICIES IN Nigeria
The importance of
education to the general well-being of mankind cannot be over-emphasized.
Education is a fundamental human right.
The relationship between education and development has been
established, such that education is now internationally accepted as a key
development index. It is in recognition of this importance that the
international community and governments all over the world have made
commitments for its citizens to have access to education.
Over the years, Nigeria
has expressed a certain level of commitment to education, with the belief that
overcoming illiteracy and ignorance will form a basis for accelerated national
development. However, regardless of the incontrovertible evidence that
education is crucial to the development of the community and the nation, there
remain inequalities in access to education. Despite its potential for leveling
opportunities, education is pathetically used to perpetrate inequalities. Millions
of poor people are still being excluded from the processes and outcomes of
education. as was observed on the streets of Uselu were children ranging from
7-28yrs were found on the streets hawking all sorts of wares ranging from
groundnuts to lacasera etc and even some of those going to school spend a
better half insome trade other than school just augment for their fees
Laws basic regulations concerning and general state of
education in nigeria
The National Policy on Education was enacted in 1977 and undergone
three revisions, the most recent one in 2003. Since 1981, a number of decrees
have been passed providing the legal framework of education in the country.
The Decree No. 16 of 1985 places special emphasis
on the education of the gifted and talented children within the
National Policy on Education.
The National Commission for Mass Literacy, Adult and Non-formal
Education, which was established by Decree No. 17 of 26 June
1990 and formally inaugurated on 5 July 1991, is charged with the
responsibility of developing strategies, coordinating programmes,
monitoring and promoting literacy and post-literacy programmes nationwide.
The Decree No. 96 of 1993 re-established the
National Primary Education Commission (NPEC). It also provides the arrangement
for funding primary education in the country.
In 1993, the National Minimum Standards and
Establishments of Institution Amendments Decree No. 9 was
promulgated. It provides for religious bodies, non-governmental organizations
and private individuals to participate in the provision of tertiary education.
By a recent decree, all companies operating in Nigeria which have
up to 100 employees on their payroll shall contribute 2% of their pre-tax
earnings to the Education Tax Fund for the funding of education.
The most crucial
strategy for sustainable education development in Nigeria is the Universal
Basic Education (UBE) Scheme, which was launched in 1999. In May 2004, the
Nigerian Legislature passed the UBE bill into law. The Universal Basic
Education Act represents the most significant reform and addresses
comprehensively the lapses of the Universal Primary Education (UPE) and the
issues of access, equality, equity, inclusiveness, affordability and quality.
In the context of Nigeria, basic education includes primary and junior
secondary education. The main policy objective is to provide universal free and
compulsory education at the primary and the first three years of secondary
school, as well as to provide functional literacy for adult illiterates
However The severe decline of the oil
market in the early eighties, combined with the Structural Adjustment Programme
(SAP), led to drastic reductions in spending on education. The result was
unpaid teacher salaries, degradation of education facilities at all levels and
strikes in universities/public schools, culminating in declining literacy rates
of which same repeated itself some couple years ago under the supposedly-failed
dispensation of Goodluck Ebele Jonathan were students stayed at home for a
total of 1yr and 4months .in his tenure for paying deaf ears to the plights of
a deplorable, depreciating, degrading and deteriorating state of affairs in the various universities
championed by ASUU. Even UNIBEN to be
precise had students standing for GST classes in student centre west wing
basement
The poor state of
education in Nigeria is aptly captured in the National Empowerment
Development Strategy as follows:
‘…the delivery of
education in Nigeria has suffered from years of neglect, compounded by
inadequate attention to policy frameworks within the sector. Findings from an
ongoing educational sector analysis confirm the poor state of education in
Nigeria. The national literacy rate is currently 57 percent. Some 49 percent of
the teaching force is unqualified. There are acute shortages of infrastructure
and facilities at all levels. Access to basic education is inhibited by gender
issues and socio-cultural beliefs and practices, among other factors. Wide
disparities persist in educational standards and learning achievements. The
system emphasizes theoretical knowledge at the expense of technical,
vocational, and entrepreneurial education. School curricula need urgent review
to make them relevant and practice oriented’
The
challenge of policy implementation
For fifty-seven years
of its existence as a sovereign nation the nation has been unable to
successfully implement the National Policy on Education (NPE). The policy which came into existence in 1997
after over four years of deliberations at various levels appeared to have
solutions to virtually all core educational problems.
However, there are
apparent serious problems in the area of implementation. Some of them are highlighted in the following
pages.
Philosophy
Nigerian education
In Section 1
Sub-Section 5, the NPE states that the Nigeria's philosophy of
education is based on the development of the individual into a sound and effective
citizen. The policy further
stressed the full integration of the individual into the community, and the
provision of equal access to educational opportunities for all citizens of the
country at the primary, secondary and tertiary levels both inside and outside
the formal school system.
With an estimated human
population of 150,000,000 illiteracy is still as high. With 65 million Nigerians
illiterate. UNESCO’s National Programme Advisor on Education, Dr Mohammed
Alkali in 2015 revealed the results of a UNESCO survey No Nigerian
Newspaper has a daily print run of 500,000 copies. There are thousands of
educated but unemployed and unemployable youths Nigerian youths who cannot pay
taxes. These people cannot be described in the words of NPE as "effective
citizens." There are also few
educated elites who have looted the treasury so massively that they could
hardly be described as "effective citizens."
Policy
on language
The de facto National Policy on Languages (in Education)
recognizes the multidimensional, multi-lingual three tier political-polity
which tries to capture the multi-ethnic and, ipso facto, multi-lingual polity
which Berlin and the British have hammered into a rough-hewn existence.
The Policy provides for:
(i) Mother-Tongue (MT) and\or Language of the immediate community (LIC) as the Language of initial literacy at the pre-primary and junior, primary levels, and of adult and non-formal education.
(ii) The three major(national) Languages - Hausa, Igbo and Yoruba at L2 as the languages of national culture and integration.
(iii) English - the official language - as the language of formal literacy, the bureaucracy, secondary and higher education, the law courts, etc.
(iv) Selected foreign languages especially, French, and Arabic, as the languages of international communication and discourse. These are the languages for which language villages have been set up. In terms of unstated policy, the NPE policy on languages:
some many decades after, French is only being learnt in a few public/private primary and secondary schools. Many Nigerian schools have no French teacher.
The Policy provides for:
(i) Mother-Tongue (MT) and\or Language of the immediate community (LIC) as the Language of initial literacy at the pre-primary and junior, primary levels, and of adult and non-formal education.
(ii) The three major(national) Languages - Hausa, Igbo and Yoruba at L2 as the languages of national culture and integration.
(iii) English - the official language - as the language of formal literacy, the bureaucracy, secondary and higher education, the law courts, etc.
(iv) Selected foreign languages especially, French, and Arabic, as the languages of international communication and discourse. These are the languages for which language villages have been set up. In terms of unstated policy, the NPE policy on languages:
some many decades after, French is only being learnt in a few public/private primary and secondary schools. Many Nigerian schools have no French teacher.
Policy on pre primary education
The National Policy on
Education in Section 9 sub-section 79 suggested that there should
be Teachers Registration Council.
Between 1977 and 1993 nothing was done to establish the Teachers
Registration Council. In 1993 Decree 31 established the council. For another
six years nothing was done to implement the provisions of the decree until 1999
when the first Registrar and Chief Executive of the Council was appointed. To date, only few teachers have been registered
while many still do not know of its existence.
Frequent
changes in policies
Politics and frequent
changes in government tend to negatively affect the implementation of the
National Policy on Education.
Professor Ajayi, one
time Provost of Federal College of Education (FCE) Osiele, Ogun State in
Nigeria made this observation:
Within the eight years
(1991-1999) that I served as Provost, the nation passed through five different
regimes (Babangida till 1993, Shonekan for less than four months in 1993, Abacha
1993-1998, Abubakar 1998-1999, Obasanjo 1999-2007). Within this period I had to operate under
eight Ministers of Education. The same thing happened at the state level. Each
of the Presidents, Ministers, Governors and Commissioners had their own
different conceptions and policies on education that they tried to implement
during their tenure. With such
instability in the system of governance, coupled with constant changes in
"Ministers of" “Ministers for” and "commissioners for," one
should not be surprised at the level of the crises the nation's education
system has witnessed over the years and the inconsistency and often
contradictory nature of the educational policies and practices. It’s one step
forward and two steps backward."
A new system of education
Presently, the Nigerian
government has come up with another system of education tagged 9-3-4
system. The first one known as 6-3-3-4 was never fully implemented, and now
this. Mrs. Bola Mosuro, the
Proprietress of Access Universal College, Lagos lamented:
"Our problem in
this country is that we often pick and drop policies as we want. In the United
States the two tier secondary school system is still in operation delivering
wonderful results. There is nothing
wrong with the 6-3-3-4 system. We simply have not implemented it well and now
we have picked another one."
Policy
on science and technology
A study carried out by
Dayo Odukoya Ph.D Less than 50% of
graduates of our tertiary institutions are products of science and
technology institutions. Graduates of humanities and social sciences are
far more than that of science and technology.
This is contrary to the National Policy on Education which recommended
70% admission into science and technology programmes.
Policy
on technical colleges
While the NPE puts the
ratio between secondary and technical vocational education/schools at 3:1,Dr
Odukoyo discovered in 2007 Nigeria has over 5,100 secondary schools with
enrolment of 4,448,991 as against technical colleges of only 169 with enrolment
of 43,354 representing ratios of 37:1 and 102:1 respectively.
According to the
policy, technical colleges are expected to feed polytechnics just as secondary
schools are to feed universities. The
prevailing situation however is that the total products of our technical
colleges represent only 17% of available spaces in polytechnics. So right from
the on-set the mission of technical colleges concerning feeding polytechnic is
not being met. Consequently, the country
tends to be producing more theoreticians than technology experts.
Differential
Remunerations for Graduates of Polytechnics and Universities
As long as entrants of
Technical Colleges cum Polytechnics are classified as the poorer students
emanating from the Junior Secondary Schools [JSS] while it is the ‘bright’ JSS
students that are admitted into Senior Secondary Schools [SSS] and
Universities, there is bound to be differential treatment of their respective
graduates.
For Africa to keep pace
with technological development around the world, something quick and pragmatic
has to be done to redress the serious problem that tends to be eroding the
little gains of the 6-3-3-4 education system.
Perhaps all Polytechnics should be upgraded to Universities of
Technology.
Policy
on private universities
In 1960/61 when there
were only two universities in Nigeria while the total student population stood
at only 1,395. This figure rose to 32,282 in 13 universities by 1975, 116,822
in 27 universities by 1983 and 180,871 in 31 universities by 1990. Even currently when there is a plethora of private universities, federal universities and
state universities these are still far from accommodating the number of
students who qualified for admission.
In fact, out of over 1
million Nigerian students that applied for university admission less than 25%
could be absorbed. This is due to the
poor implementation of the policy which had long ago recommended greater expenditure
on education to create more space for the youths.
Policy
on ict
The Federal Executive
Council approved a national IT policy in March 2001 and the
implementation started in April with the establishment of the National
Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA), charged with the
implementation responsibility. The policy recognized the private sector as the
driving engine of the IT sector.
The policy is however
overdue for review due to changes and advances in ICT globally and in
Nigeria. Consequently, government inaugurated the Nigerian National ICT for
Development (ICT4D) Strategic Action Plan committee to develop a new ICT policy
vis-Ã -vis action plan/roadmap for the nation.
Emerging Issues
with ERNWACA(Educational Research Network for West and Central Africa) Nigeria
In recent years ERNWACA
Nigeria has been conducting policy-oriented researches such as: Impact of
Non-Formal Education [NFE] on the Mitigation of Spread of HIV/AIDS; Evaluation
of NTI programme; Evaluation of University Education Curriculum; Link Between Engineering Training Programmes and Graduates’ Productivity and
recently the studies on Mode of
Implementation of Nigerian Secondary School Curriculum - Towards Socio-economic
Empowerment of Youth; and Universal Basic Education & Socio-Economic
Prospect of the Girl-Child in South-South Nigeria.
The major challenge is
in translating the core research findings into implementable policies.
Consequently, many of our past research reports have been virtually lying on
the shelves. This is quite pathetic as this is tantamount to waste of colossal
financial, manpower and material resources.
Other challenges facing
ERNWACA Nigeria in conducting education research for policy formulation and
implementation are enumerated in the following slides:
Need
for Good Understanding of the Process of Policy Formulation
There is dire need for
a good understanding of the process of policy formulation. This
understanding is apt to positively influence our research methodology and
reporting system. It is also likely to enhance the acceptability of our
research findings for policy formulation.
Lobbying
and advocacy
There is also a dire
need for a thorough understanding of the principles and operation of
lobbying and advocacy. It is
becoming common knowledge that the correct application of these indispensable
principles is vital for the successful translation of research findings into
national educational policy formation and implementation.
Logistic
problems
There is also a dire
need for a thorough understanding of the principles and operation of
lobbying and advocacy. It is
becoming common knowledge that the correct application of these indispensable
principles is vital for the successful translation of research findings into
national educational policy formation and implementation.
Policy
Formulation versus Policy Implementation
Furthermore, it is one
thing to succeed in getting our research findings translated into national
policies; it is another ballgame altogether getting them implemented. This may
often necessitate further follow-up and intensive lobbying.
Part of the problem
here has to do with incessant changes and paucity of technocrats within the
government. Lack of understanding of the power of well-formulated policy
and diligent implementation in effecting educational and national development
apparently account for this
Implications for national development
Education is an instrument for
excellence. It librates people from Poverty and ignorance. Ukeje (1966:155)
believes that “education is For life and for living. It is an investment in
people which pays untold Dividends to the society. When that investment is not
made or is Made inadequately, the society suffers a loss”. Presumably it is in Recognition
of this importance of education that the 1999 constitution Of the Federal
Republic of Nigeria provided at Section 18 as follows:
(1) Government shall direct its policy
towards ensuring that there are Equal and adequate educational opportunities at
all levels.
(2) Government shall promote science and
technology.
(3) Government shall strive to eradicate
illiteracy; and to this end,
Government shall as and when practicable
provide:
(a) free, compulsory and universal
primary education
(b) free secondary education
(c) free university education, and
(d) free adult literacy programs (FRN,
1999:18).
It is in pursuance of this
constitutional provision that the National Policy on Education was developed
and accepted. Nigeria’s Educational philosophy is also anchored on this
constitutional
Mandate. The importance of education to
national development is no longer In doubt. The issue that agitates the mind is
the effect of poor Implementation of educational policies on the development of
Nigeria. It was Ake (1988:2) who said that “education is the process Of becoming
the best we can be”. With the numerous crises in the Educational system
engendered by poor policy implementation, it Is doubtful whether its recipients
are really becoming the best as Expected. If not, what is the fate of Nigeria? The
euphoria with which Nigerians welcomed the National Policy on Education has
died down and been replaced with despondency due to
Non-performance. The National
Educational Research Council Report Of the Baguada Seminar of September 1980
captured this euphoria as Expressed in that seminar thus:
The
introduction of the new system of education is
Deemed
crucial to the implementation of the philosophy of
“developmentalism”.
It is hoped that when fully operational, it
Will
help transform the society and launch the nation along the
Developmental
trajectory that will lead us to a state of parity
With
the advanced world (Baguada Report 1980:7).
In the same state of mind, Ukeje
(1986:8) noted that “the 6-3-3-4 System is more than a structure. It is a new
process, a new orientation and a new activity, which hopefully will lead to new
individuals and A new and bright future”. The ineffective implementation of the
Various programs canvassed by the
National Policy on Education has Relegated these hopes and optimism to
back-stage. Nigeria is caught Between one ‘evil’ (the rejected British
educational system which is Still unofficially practiced) and one ‘saint’ (the
accepted American Educational system which we can neither officially nor unofficially
Practise). Consequently, the conservatism of the British educational System which
helped us to maintain our traditional values and a Healthy society has been
lost. On the other hand, the American system
With its potential for technological
development and growth has failed To make any difference in our society because
we have not learned Anything. In the present circumstance, the dream of Nigeria
to move to a state Of parity with the advanced world appears to be a mirage.
Ukeje
(1986) was full of hope that the new
system would lead to new Individuals and a new and bright future. Eighteen
years later, the System has not produced new individuals and the future appears
More hopeless than in 1982 when the
policy commenced. If Nigeria continues to hide under the umbrella of the
National Policy on Education conscious of the implementation problems, our
National aspirations will suffer greater
impediments. Our national Development will only rely on miracles, if any. The
British system Of education was found inadequate for Nigeria’s developmental Purposes.
It is also true that the American system has failed in Nigeria
Because of our sociological
circumstances. We need not continue to Deceive ourselves with a national
educational policy that has been Found unworkable else in the future there will
be no policy to lay Hold on.
Recommendations/Way forward
There is an urgent need for a workable
educational policy for Nigeria. It is for this reason that the following
recommendations are advanced
v
Establish a standard for conducting research
[research method] and for reporting – from problem identification,
title formulation, proposal writing, sampling, instrument development and
validation, fieldwork, data analysis, result presentation, abstract writing and
referencing.
v
Institute an annual specialized seminar/training
session on the significance and process of policy formulation and
implementation for researchers and for key government functionaries in
all ERNWACA member countries.
v
Institute an annual specialized training on effective
advocacy and lobbying strategies (same audience)
v
Evolve research themes that have strong bearing
on the formulation and implementation of national educational policies. This should be applicable with our on-going
Annual Small Grant program.
v
Budget adequately for these seminars/training
programmes and for the necessary logistics to follow-up and follow-through on
getting our research findings adopted for policy formulation and
implementation.
v
These activities should be implemented by the
National Coordinators and monitored closely by the Regional Coordinator.
v
The present national educational policy should
be disbanded on Account of its non-workability.
v
An indigenous system of education fashioned
after the models Operated by Asian countries shouldnt be adopted. Ideas that
are Alien to the cultures of Nigeria should be avoided because they are Bound to
fail.
v
Education should be removed from the sphere of
politics. It should Be made purely a constitutional matter, but not as provided
by the 1999 constitution which allows escape routes for political leaders. When
the constitution states that "Government shall as and when Practicable provide
free education at different levels”, the right To education has been denied the
citizens and political leaders May be non-committal as the provision of
education becomes a Discretionary matter.
v
The entrenchment of education as a
non-negotiable right of every Citizen in the constitution would help check
corruption in that Sector. Corruption is largely responsible for the failure of
the National Policy on Education and other policies in Nigeria.
v
Mismanagement of educational resources at any
level should Be made a serious offence attracting a minimum of five years’
Imprisonment. This should be included in the next constitution Of Nigeria. It
is believed that in the presence of corruption no new System of education can
succeed.
v
Nigerian governments and leaders should develop
the necessary Political will for education to grow.
v
Every effort should be made to eradicate
corruption from all Spheres of Nigeria’s various programs so that available
resources Can be utilized for public
interest.
Conclusion
From the literature reviewed, we can
conclude that the Implementation of educational policies in Nigeria are
constrained by The following factors.
• Most educational policies are well
focused but the planning is Often defective, making implementation difficult.
• Resources available for the
implementation of a given educational Policy are often over-estimated and
thereby elicit unrealistic Expectations that fail to materialize.
• Since educational policies are usually
translated into plans before implementation, studies have shown that the costs
of Implementing such plans have often been under-estimated. Most
Educational policies have become stalled
at the planning stage.
• Reliable data have not been a popular
feature in planning Education in Nigeria. This situation has not facilitated
the effective Implementation of educational plans.
• The implementation of educational
policies is also often hindered By the interplay of politics, which may
sometimes relegate reality To obscurity.
• Qualified teachers are not in sufficient
numbers in the entire Educational system in Nigeria. Studies have already
confirmed this To be true of the U.B.E. Scheme, as well as the secondary
education Program. The tertiary level of education, where hundreds of Students
receive lectures hanging out of windows and doors and Taught by one lecturer,
is also confirmation.
• Facilities such as classrooms, offices,
laboratories, workshops, Libraries, power, water et cetera are basic
requirements in every School system. These have been found to be grossly
inadequate In most Nigerian educational institutions. The Academic Staff Union
of Universities (ASUU) has confirmed this in its numerous Publications.
• Insufficiency of funds for
implementing educational policies In Nigeria is a problem that has recurred in
almost every Implementation study that has been carried out. The importance Of
funds for carrying out any activity need not be over-emphasised.
• Government lacks the political will
for effective implementation.
• Corruption at all levels hinders the
implementation of educational Policies and programs.
The cost of advocating and lobbying to
get our research findings adopted for policy formulation and implementation is
a far cry from the colossal amount that
have been spent on unutilized research efforts in the past decades. This
colossal waste would be significantly reduced, and with time, totally
eliminated by venturing to spend a little more on carrying advocacy/lobbing to
a logical conclusion. This is the thrust of this paper. Let us give it a trial
and a push. We shall surely get there
References
Adesina, O. (2004). The Guardian
Newspaper, Monday, 1 November, p.16.
Adesina, S. (1977). Planning and
educational development in Nigeria, Ibadan: Education Industries (Nigeria)
Ltd.
Adighije, C. (2005). Saturday Sun
Newspaper, 9 April, p. 5.
Aghenta, J.A. (1984). Towards a systems
approach to the planning of Secondary education in Nigeria’, in Adesina, Segun
and Ogusaju (eds.), Secondary education in Nigeria, Ile Ife: University
of Ife Press.
Akagbou, S.D. (1985). The economics
of educational planning in Nigeria, India: Vikas Publishing House, PVT Ltd.
Ake, C. (1988). ‘Quality education in a
dwindling economy’, lecture delivered On the occasion of the 11th Convocation
Ceremony of the Rivers State College of Education, Port Harcourt.
Awokoya, S.O.(1981). ‘The parameters of
educational planning’, in Adesina, S. (ed.), Introduction to educational
planning. Ile Ife: University of Ife Press.
Baguada Report (1980). Perspectives
of quantities and qualities in Nigerian Education, NERC Report of the
Baguada Seminar.
Bello, J.Y. (1986). ‘The 6-3-3-4 system:
another exercise in futility?’, a Paper presented at the Annual Convention of
the Nigeria Association Of Educational Administration and Planning at the
University of Port Harcourt.
Dr. Dayo
Odukoya Education & Development Consultant ERNWACA, Faculty of
Education, University of Lagos dayoodukoya@gmail.com
234-8034730219
Ejiogu, B. (2005). Daily Sun
Newspaper, Monday, 11 April, p.10. Federal Republic of Nigeria (1999). The
Constitution of the Federal Republic Of Nigeria, Abuja: Federal Ministry of
Information.
Hodges, A. (2001). Children’s and
women’s rights in Nigeria: a wake-up Call, Abuja: National Planning
Commission and UNICEF.
Hoy, W.K. & Miskel, C.G. (1978). Educational
administration: theory, Research, and practice, New York: Random House.
Kerr, D.H. (1976). Educational
policy: analysis, structure and justifi cation, New York: David mckay
Company.
I have to voice my passion for your kindness giving support to those people that should have guidance on this important matter.
ReplyDeleteSurya Informatics