THE PRESIDENT LACKS LEGAL-RATIONAL ON CORRUPT OFFICIALS

The president has no protected command to test CORRUPT officials forcefully

     Give us a chance to think about the Deputy President of the Nigerian Senate as, similar to a co-pilot. His hands are on the same lever with the president of the senate, exploring the country through the tempests of country fabricate. That is correct: country building does not happen at the official office, it happens in the assemblies of the country's administrative houses. This is a genuinely clear adage of majority rule government: without the parliament, there is no republic. The parliament legitimizes a free law based state. It is the very wellspring of all forces of administration. The parliament of the area is the most capable establishment of state, not the workplace of president, as most Nigerians, still saturated with military-time attitude tend to think. The President is a hireling of the chose, and constituted National Assembly. While the National Assembly is both the voice, the ears, and the eyes of people in general in the arrangement of popularity based principle. They don't reply to whatever other individual – neither to the courts nor to the president – yet to the general population. That is the reason, at whatever point there is an upset, the principal organization that is abrogated is the parliament of the area. For whatever length of time that the parliament is in session, the country exists. In any case, wherever a parliament is annulled, the country goes into a rest. In that occurrence, the president answers to nobody. That is the significance of absolutism. The main force parliament records to is the general population. I have to underscore this once more. Which is the reason I was both startled and actually shocked this previous week on perusing the senseless letter to the US Congress, the EU, the UK, and the UN, by the Deputy president of senate, Mr. Ike Ekweremadu, griping that Nigeria's majority rule government is undermined. I am shocked that the Nigerian squeeze that assented to exalt such a mediocre letter by distributed it, didn't go, as a feature of its commitment to the general population, to ask Mr. Ekweremadu what he expected the UN, the US Congress, the UK, and the EU to do with his letter of dissension. I don't particularly review that the Speaker of the UK Parliament kept in touch with Nigeria, or the AU, or the US Congress, or the UN when the "Yes" vote carried on the Brexit submission, or at whatever point the Labor Opposition battled with the decision Conservative gathering in the Commons. Nor have I even listened, or seen any self-regarding African country abusing its sovereign order to such an extent as Nigerians in making such senseless speaks to the "worldwide group." Yes, Africans now call Nigeria: "the huge trick." It is such an exceptional move, from the "goliath of Africa" to the "enormous blockhead of Africa" since Nigerian open authorities are colonized, purified, mesmerized, and maybe truth be told, lobotomized so much that they confuse their place on the world stage. Nigeria is at present a second rate country since she is controlled by sub-par men and ladies. A large portion of us feel totally embarrassed by the nature of people that we have figured out how to hand over the sovereign command, and it is my perspective that the full measure of Ike Ekweremadu as an official and government official can be taken in the weight and noteworthiness of his letter. The US Congress or the UK government or the UN does not have voting rights in Nigeria. Ike Ekweremadu did not keep in touch with his constituents whom he speaks to in Enugu, nor to the Nigerian individuals, whose perspectives and activities, and interests, matter in this inquiry. He didn't compose a straight and unambiguous letter to the president to back off. He didn't keep in touch with his administrative associates to commute home the need of shielding the republic from the interruption of a rampaging elephant in a China shop. He kept in touch with some outsider powers whose suppositions are truly unimportant to whatever may happen to this quickly advancing circumstance. Also, I'm sorry to learn that Ekweremadu's letter just demonstrates that he should not be wearing the shoes of forceful men. He has additionally demonstrated the normal Nigerian government officials utter lack of regard of the Nigerian electorate from whom they determine their commands. He has likewise exhibited that he does not have a fundamental handle of the way of his own command as a congressperson of the republic. Maybe I ought to blueprint this fundamentally by saying that the president's activities, for occasion, in these hostile to defilement tests, usurps the force of the lawmaking body. President Buhari has no order to test debasement or abuse of open assets. The main establishment ordered by the constitution to test any individual or any foundation of government is the National Assembly and the different Houses of Assembly. Here is the thing that the Nigerian constitution says without equivocalness: " 85. (1) There might be an Auditor-General for the Federation who should be delegated as per the procurements of segment 86 of this Constitution. (2) the general population records of the Federation and of all workplaces and courts of the Federation might be evaluated and provided details regarding to the Auditor-General who should present his reports to the National Assembly; and for that reason, the Auditor-General or any individual approved by him for that benefit might have entry to every one of the books, records, returns and different archives identifying with those records. (3) Nothing in subsection (2) of this segment might be interpreted as approving the Auditor-General to review the records of or name examiners for government statutory enterprises, commissions, powers, offices, including all persons and bodies set up by an Act of the National Assembly, yet the Auditor-General should – (a) give such bodies – (i) a rundown of evaluators qualified to be selected by them as outside inspectors and from which the bodies should choose their outer examiners, and (ii) rules on the level of expenses to be paid to outside examiners; and (b) remark on their yearly records and reviewer's reports consequently. (4) The Auditor-General should have energy to direct checks of all administration statutory organizations, commissions, powers, offices, including all persons and bodies set up by an Act of the National Assembly. (5) The Auditor-General should, inside ninety days of receipt of the Accountant-General's budgetary proclamation, present his reports under this segment to every House of the National Assembly and every House might bring about the reports to be considered by a board of trustees of the House of the National Assembly in charge of open records. (6) In the activity of his capacities under this Constitution, the Auditor-General might not be liable to the course or control of whatever other power or individual." The National Assembly can likewise summon anyone before it, including the president of the republic, and in addition cause the expulsion of anyone from office by indictment, including the president or his Attorney General. The National Assembly can command the Attorney General to attempt the president for injustice, in the event that it observes the president to be a risk to the republic. The National Assembly can defund the workplace of the Attorney General, the EFCC or any statutory office of government, or cause it to go into suspension. The National Assembly can stop the elements of the central government by de-approving any presidential use. That is the degree of the force of the governing body. With respect to the present diversion of trial for "phony" of the president and delegate president of senate, one is altogether stunned that these courteous fellows assented to show up in court! No court of the area has the power to summon any official to court on inquiries around techniques, examinations, or activities did inside the loads of the National Assembly. This is the practice everywhere throughout the world. The claim of "fraud" of senate standards is a diversion on the grounds that the principles of senate are liable to change, and is the thing that it is, the point at which a sitting senate votes to utilize, revise, or dispose of it by and large, as its directing edge. It is not subject to the interruption of any court, substantially less the assumption of wrongdoing by the Attorney General. This, Mr. Ekweremadu and Dr.Saraki should know, and ought to be appropriately prompted, as a demonstration respecting their command, to cease from seeming any further before any courts on this matter, and assume responsibility of their administrative obligations.

Comments